CX 2024 Preliminary Programme
Day 2 Morning: Acute Stroke, Carotid & Neuro-intervention Controversies - Wednesday, 24th April
Venue: Theatre 3
Acute Stroke, Carotid & Neuro-intervention Controversies
“Unanswered questions" arising from the 2023 ESVS guidelines
Speaker: | Ross Naylor, Leicester, United Kingdom |
Audience participation & discussion
Cryptogenic stroke
Speaker: | Lars Kellert, Munich, Germany |
Audience participation & discussion
Debate: Patients with symptomatic near occlusion in the internal carotid artery (ICA) should only be treated medically
For the motion
Konstantinos Antonopoulos, Athens, Greece |
Against the motion
Barbara Rantner, Munchen, Germany |
Audience participation & discussion
Results from the registry on post-dissection internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms
Speaker: | Gert Jan de Borst, Utrecht, Netherlands |
Audience participation & discussion
Acute Stroke Controversies Carousel: Aftertreatment of a post-dissection ICA-aneurysm - leaving solid ground
Speaker: | Barbara Rantner, Munchen, Germany |
Audience participation & discussion
Stroke in the context of complex aortic aneurysm repair, incidences and strategies to avoid
Speaker: | Daniela Branzan, Leipzig, Germany |
Audience participation & discussion
Transcarotid Artery Revascularisation (TCAR) high-risk patient population and new diffusion-weighted MRI hits
Speaker: | Michael Stoner, Rochester, United States |
Audience participation & discussion
Debate: Best medical treatment (BMT) only is as effective as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis
For the motion
Melina Vega de Ceniga, Usansolo, Spain |
Against the motion
Richard Bulbulia, Cheltenham, United Kingdom |
Audience participation & discussion
Debate: Patients with symptomatic carotid artery web should only be treated medically
For the motion
Alun Davies, London, United Kingdom |
Against the motion
Maarit Venermo, Helsinki, Finland |
Audience participation & discussion
Debate: Patients with vertebro-basilar ischaemia should only be treated with endovascular intervention
For the motion
Hugh Markus, Cambridge, United Kingdom |
Against the motion
Francesco Spinelli, Roma, Italy |
Audience participation & discussion
Acute Stroke Controversies Carousel: Where eagles dare
Speaker: | Domenico Valenti, London, United Kingdom |
Audience participation & discussion
Coffee break
Sponsored education
Acute Stroke, Carotid & Neuro-intervention Controversies
Key note lecture: Patient selection and timing of mechanical thrombectomy
Speaker: | Dominick McCabe, Ireland, Dublin |
Audience participation & discussion
Technical tips and bail out strategies after mechanical thrombectomy
Audience participation & discussion
Debate: CAS is the treatment of choice for underlying ICA stenosis after mechanical thrombectomy
For the motion
Kyriakos Lobotesis, London, United Kingdom |
Against the motion
Francesco Greco, Padua, Italy |
Audience participation & discussion
Neurointervention Controversies Carousel
Speaker: | Levansri Makalanda, London, United Kingdom |
Audience participation & discussion
Optical Coherence Tomography analysis of carotid stenting and the benefit of micromesh stent design
Speaker: | Gianmarco de Donato, Siena, Italy |
Audience participation & discussion
Mechanical thrombectomy for posterior circulation stroke
Audience participation & discussion
Flow diversion device for the treatment of aneurysm and false aneurysm extra and intracranially
Speaker: | Naga Kandasamy, London, United Kingdom |
Audience participation & discussion